Bunchird DN I para. 410 (Poṭṭhapāda-sutta) and at least other 16 places in DN and SN Pending – This is a 50/50 reading in manuscripts. C+Ee read sāgata while SEA read svāgata. In the ITAP, the selected readings are inconsistant. Some place with sāgata, other place with svāgata. Tentatively, sāgata should be preferable according to the policies … Read more
Problem: the Editing Page show ‘Please Wait’ and do not proceed. Solution: Allow pop-up at the end of the address bar as shown below:
MN II para. 374 (Dhammacetiya-sutta) Interesting variants. The reading mittupahāraṃ seems to be more preferable. (1) Confusion of letter mi- and ci- in a Sinhalese script (the below image is from C1). (2) Similar parallel in AN (Dasakanipāta para. 30) strongly read the word mettūpahāraṃ with commentarial explanation. (3) Chinese parallel in MA 213, 下意恭敬, … Read more
MN II para. 374 (Dhammacetiya-sutta) Pending – both form are possible. We may need to study more from a point of philological view. According to Dr. Yamanaka (Feb 2021), the reading kātuṃ is a younger form. Cr. Ven. Rathanathissa, Dr. Yamanaka
MN II para. 375 (Kaṇṇakatthala-sutta) uruññāyaṃ (B8.9.10 Be); uraññcāraṃ (B6) ujuññāyaṃ (Ee); ujuṃñāyaṃ (C2.3.4.5); ujuṃkāyaṃ (C1); ujukāyaṃ (Ce) udaññāya (K8 T3.5); udañjāya (K6.9); {uda}ññāyaṃ (B7); uda{ññā}yaṃ (K7); udaññāyaṃ (K10 Se) om. (T4.6) It is the city name, and the reading Ujuññāyaṃ is most preferable. (1) B for Uruññā, C for Ujuññā, K+T for Udaññā (2) … Read more
ITAP counts words in Skip and Lost which causes misnumbering to the number of word and line orders. This takes researchers more time to work with manuscripts. Would it be possible to fix this? Cr. Ven. Sorat
In case of finding …pe… with skipped word(s), please have …pe… before <<Ⓢaaa bbb ccc>> Cr. Ven. Thaniyo, Ven. Somkiat ✓ …pe… <<Ⓢaaa bbb ccc>> ✗ <<Ⓢaaa bbb ccc>> …pe…✓ [[…pe…]] <<Ⓢaaa bbb ccc>> ✗ <<Ⓢaaa bbb ccc>> [[…pe…]]